Hunger Games Review By: Deana Hasandjekaj
Hunger Games: Fantastic, or Flop?
Going into the Hunger Games, I was expecting a kind of “Twilight Effect” to occur-back when I actually used to like it (sorry if I’m offending any fans or frankly anyone by saying this). What I mean by the “Twilight Effect” is that I had high expectations for the movie but when I saw it, it was absolutely dreadful. As a reader of all three Hunger Games books, I was curious how they’d portray the movie, especially with all of the gory scenes.
After the movie, I felt nothing close to the “Twilight Effect.” Instead, I was very happy with how the director chose to film it. The movie overall followed the book very well; it was as if I was reading the book as each event happened on screen. The only modified idea was the concept of how the mockingjay pin was brought about, but I thought it still made a lot of sense. For those of you who have not seen the movie, it is simply a pin that Katniss Everdeen, the main character, (played by Jennifer Lawrence) wears in the Hunger Games.
From the very beginning of the movie, I loved the places that were chosen to film the movie. The entire concept of the book was explained perfectly in the movie, during the exposition. What I enjoyed most was that the information wasn’t overbearing, yet it was crucial for the audience members who haven’t read the book. Another aspect of the movie I enjoyed was that there was no “Team Gale ” (Liam Hemsworth) and “Team Peeta” (Josh Hutcherson), as was the case in the Twlight series . Gale Hawthorne, Katniss’ best friend from home, and Peeta Mellark, chosen as District 12’s male tribute, were shown as possible love interests, but the movie did not harp on romance at all. However, I did wish that the movie focused on Peeta and Katniss’ closeness before and during the Hunger Games a bit more.
The movie also followed the order of the book almost exactly. It went from the reaping, to preparing for the hunger games, before finally entering the Hunger Games. The most important part of the movie are the Games themselves. I had no idea how the movie would depict them-would it be a hit or miss? I thought the way the movie portrayed them was pretty much spot on. As I watched the movie, it looked exactly how I pictured them in the book. What was great about the movie was that you got to see perspectives other than Katniss’. For example, you could see President Snow and the member of the Capitol (the government system) creating and manipulating the Hunger Games as they went on.
The one downside of the film is that I felt was that it did not leave as much of an impact as the book did on me. In the book, I was able to hear Katniss’ feelings more, and find out more about Gale and the other tributes. In the movie, some of the tributes names weren’t even mentioned, which kind of annoyed me. However, the most important scenes were done very well. The one thing I liked about the movie that you miss out from the book is actually sitting in front of a screen and visually seeing people getting killed. Although it is a lot gorier in the book, you still get a clear image in the movie of what happens. I wish there was a little bit more gore in it, but since Hunger Games was released as a PG- 13 film, it is understandable why it would not be as much violence
Overall, I thought the film portrayed the book very well. It followed the story for exactly what it was and it was cool to see the characters and the Capitol come to life. The acting of the main characters was very well done, especially Jennifer Lawrence , Josh Hutcherson and Woody Harrelson as Haymitch (the coach for District 12). Definitely check it out if you had not seen it. Rotten Tomatoes and fans have given it a mostly positive reception. Additionally, I highly recommend reading the book before seeing the movie, as it fills in some of the information that the film leaves out.



